| Author |
Message |
Zowie72 Members

Joined: 10 Feb 2011 Location: Auckland, New Zealand
|
Posted: 2011.05.07(Sat)2:33 Post subject: Grammar question. |
|
|
Should it be "I have 5 corys." or "I have 5 cories." ?
Just something I've been wondering as I have a dilemma every time I write it, not sure which it should be.
Zowie |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
UncleWillie Advisors

Joined: 26 Nov 2007 Location: Georgia, USA
|
Posted: 2011.05.07(Sat)6:36 Post subject: |
|
|
You could say corydoras and you won't have to worry about it
Really, I don't think it matters. You can think of it like the mollies. Molly - singular, and mollies is plural. You could follow that line of thinking, and go with cories. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Peterjay New Members
Joined: 19 Feb 2011 Location: Gales Ferry, CT, USA
|
Posted: 2011.05.08(Sun)7:54 Post subject: |
|
|
I doubt there's a hard and fast rule or a generally accepted form. "Y" usually becomes "ies" when expressed in the plural, unless you're talking about a proper name. Whether or not abbreviated scientific names fit that description is anybody's guess. I'd say either is correct.
BTW: considering the way the English language is mangled in online discussion forums, (especially by my fellow Americans) it's refreshing to find someone who cares enough to ask. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
monstrosity Regulars

Joined: 16 Oct 2009 Location: Tennessee, USA
|
Posted: 2011.05.16(Mon)9:16 Post subject: |
|
|
cories. _________________
29 G |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Marcos Avila Moderators

Joined: 05 Feb 2003 Location: Santo Andre (Brazil)
|
Posted: 2011.05.16(Mon)16:15 Post subject: |
|
|
| Peterjay wrote: | | I doubt there's a hard and fast rule or a generally accepted form. |
I agree there's probably no hard and fast rule in this case, but the most generally accepted form is definitely cories. _________________
Success with a fish/tank is measured in YEARS, not months or weeks... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
deborah_claro Advisors
Joined: 11 May 2006 Location: Virginia, USA
|
Posted: 2011.07.18(Mon)22:40 Post subject: corys vs cories. |
|
|
There is no rule that applies because the term "cory" is not a noun, as such.
It's an abbreviation for the latin term "Corydoras."
Therefore, if you shorten "Corydoras" to "cory" then you have every cause to pluralize it by using the term "corys."
As the term "cory" is not slang, but an abbreviation for convenience, there is no need to capitalize the plural, "corys."
Anyway, these are the "rules" I go by when I use the term corys.
 _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
keithkyli Members
Joined: 27 Apr 2010
|
Posted: 2011.07.20(Wed)23:37 Post subject: |
|
|
Actually "cories" is the latest step of a series of simplifications and localizations.
The most grammatically and scientifically correct way to say it should be "Corydoras catfishes".
Corydoras catfishes ->
corydoras as a common word ->
cory as a common word ->
corys as a simple plural form ->
cories when people take "cory" as a genuine English word, which it actually isn't.
In the name Corydoras, "cory" comes from Greek kory which means "helmet". By saying "corys" or "cories" we're essentially saying "helmets". "I have four helmets in my tank" would sound like military talk.
I use "corys" but I don't care how other people spell it, because it is not genuine English after all. Well, "guppy" has become a common word and few would question the authenticity of "guppies". However, Guppy was a person's name. Or something like "I googled it".
Think about it, the scientific name for humans is Homo sapiens, and Homo for the humanoid genus. How would you react if we don't have a common word "human" but have to resort to the scientific name.
"The king and the queen are powerful homos."
"There are 1.3 billion homos in China."
"I am a homo, you are a homo, we are all homos."
"Shouldn't it be homoes?"
"No, I'll simplify it to hos. We're all hos."
"Yeah! Power to the hos!"
Just a little grammar joke.  _________________ Diamond Hill, Hong Kong |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
diademhill Advisors
Joined: 18 Apr 2007
|
Posted: 2011.07.21(Thu)1:55 Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | The most grammatically and scientifically correct way to say it should be "Corydoras catfishes". |
Actually that should be Corydoras cartfish! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
UncleWillie Advisors

Joined: 26 Nov 2007 Location: Georgia, USA
|
Posted: 2011.07.21(Thu)6:45 Post subject: |
|
|
Haha. I really did laugh out loud at your post, keithkyli.
'Catfishes' is correct of you are talking about multiple species. If you are talking about several individuals of one species, then 'catfish' is correct.
"The catfishes are some of my favorite critters," and "I love my 2 yellow bullheads. Those catfish do great in a tank" are proper usages.
The usage of fish vs. fishes has kind of been lost and forgotten. For example, if you are a fishermen, you say: "I went down to the pond, and caught a bunch of fish!" Usually fishermen target one species, and so the usage is correct. However, when several types of fish were caught, no one returned home saying: "I went down to the pond and caught a bunch of fishes!"
I think we should all just call them fishies anyway, and save a lot of trouble. Hehe  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|